Heureka!

Heureka indeed… The missing piece of the puzzle. But this time, I want to proceed differently. Now I can qualitatively explain the behaviour of a magnetic fields and phenomena related to them, but I want more. This more means certain corrections to TOEBI but the gain makes it worthwhile, we’ll have the complete toolset for every particle related calculation.

What’s going to happen?

  1. I’ll stop writing this blog until I have finished my paper and I don’t have any idea for how long that will take. Surely I’ll answer your questions in comments but that’s all.
  2. The paper will satisfy scientific requirements, hence it should be peer reviewed and published. I’ll ask your feedback before submitting the paper.
  3. TOEBI 2.0 will be launched.

That’s all folks!

24 thoughts on “Heureka!

  1. > Now I can qualitatively explain the behaviour of a magnetic
    > fields and phenomena related to them,

    And you’re expecting anyone to take that at face value?

    > TOEBI 2.0 will be launched.

    What’s the official status of TOEBI 1.X while you’re secretly
    working on 2.0? Still no global disclaimer in order? Still
    statements like “Presented theory is a new theoretical platform
    which functions as the true theory of everything.”
    or “Country (or countries) who adopts first the ToEbi predicted
    antimatter phenomena and technology has a HUGE advantage over
    the other countries in every way.” on display?

  2. At the moment, I haven’t thought about my previous promises and claims too much. But I have to think them through in the light of this new heureka realisation. I have a hunch that those promises and claims are still pretty much valid.

    And you’re expecting anyone to take that at face value?

    No I’m not, but that’s irrelevant because the future paper is the most important thing.

  3. > At the moment, I haven’t thought about my previous promises
    > and claims too much.

    Of course not, you never have, with the known result
    (no promise kept, no claim proved). And that’s
    what makes every new promise or claim so exceedingly believable,
    even when labeled “2.0”.

    > I have a hunch that those promises and claims are still pretty
    > much valid.

    Against all evidence, sure. And I have a hunch that instead of
    the paper which “will satisfy scientific requirements” (terrific
    joke), we will get bombastic but undisclosing news of
    breathtaking advances in your study, together with the usual
    TOEBI praising.

    >> And you’re expecting anyone to take that at face value?
    >
    > No I’m not, but that’s irrelevant

    Your trustworthiness is irrelevant to you, that makes sense.

  4. Dear Berry, thank you for your kind words… I made my choices regarding pompous claims and predictions partly deliberately and partly due to my intrinsic properties. Otherwise getting attention for my TOE would have been even less successful, at least so I thought, I’m not so sure about that anymore. But what is done is done.

    But I managed to get some attention from you and (your friend?) yop. I don’t have any physicists in my social circles, so the outcome was positive. You challenged me to the point where I had to stop and think more deeply and conquer the fundamental problems in my previous thinking. Now it’s time to walk the walk and do the theory properly.

    Naturally, I was hoping all the long to attract physicist or two for a collaboration but that didn’t materialise. I hope TOEBI 2.0 changes that.

  5. Oh gosh… So, first of all, I don’t know Berry and never saw him. We obviously share the same kind of perversion to spend time here, but that’s all I know. Maybe we could be friend, maybe not.

    Second, thinking being pompous and bragging was the good way for your theory to have success was a bad move. Terrible. The only good move was to present a credible theory. Like something that works for more than Earth and Moon or 2 electrons. Remember that, at the beginning you claimed to have found an ether that worked for gravitation after computing it only for Moon and Earth!

    Your TOE didn’t get attention from anyone else than mockers because it didn’t deserve it. It has nothing to do with being pompous or anything.

  6. Hi yop,

    You are right, my theory at the beginning was full of errors, rookie level errors. But now I have realised something which has given me the tools for proper theory development. I just need to put the pieces together as elegantly and scientifically as possible and hopefully get peer reviewed and published. Before that last step you can give your opinion about the outcome.

  7. > my theory at the beginning was full of errors, rookie level
    > errors.

    And in the end, too; and in between as well. You have removed
    many absurdities from TOEBI, sure, but its number of correct
    predictions only grew from one to two.

    Statements as recent as
    http://www.toebi.com/blog/theory-of-everything-by-illusion/spinning-vectors-unleashed/#comment-2542
    show that you were still not willing or not capable to perform
    basic sanity checks on your own. That this should have changed
    by finding some dubious “missing piece”, by some magical
    “realisation” is as believable as all your previous “Now I’ve
    got it!”-claims.

    But if refraining from self praising until the appearance of a
    paper, which satisfies scientific requirements, is a property of
    TOEBI 2.0, that would be a most welcome step. Then again, it’s a
    promise of yours, so I wouldn’t bet anything on it. We’ll
    see…

  8. We’ll see…

    It’s my promise and I’m gonna keep it. Doing otherwise is not an option because I have now all the needed elements available.

  9. Kimmo,

    I am excited to learn about TOEBI and its 2.0 extension !!!

    Keep up the good work and keeping fingers
    crossed for the new launch,

    Fritz

  10. > It is easy to criticize,

    Did you realize at all that we gave specific arguments as to what’s wrong with TOEBI and why? Have you any rebuttals to offer?

    > but what is your alternative?

    Alternative to what and for what?

  11. Hi fritz,

    And welcome to TOEBI blog. No need to criticize Berry nor yop, they have provided very much needed reviewing for TOEBI. They have also forced me to the right, scientific, path.

  12. > they have provided very much needed reviewing for TOEBI.

    still… their tone of voice is disrespectful

  13. No way! That’s created by (an individual banned from TOEBI blog using alias) dwarf.

    I do have an account there, my username is illusion. I haven’t been active there for a while.

  14. I don’t understand. That dwarf guy seems quite supportive for TOEBI.
    Why would you ban him??? Honestly, that seems a little suspicious to me…

  15. For some reason, your comment was in spam queue… weird!

    I banned him because his behaviour went overboard after Berry and Yop appeared. I gave him a chance but he went overboard again, what a shame 🙁

  16. > I banned him because his behaviour went overboard after Berry and Yop appeared.

    I see. Seems that some people just can’t behave properly…
    (maybe that accounts to Berry+Yop as well???)

    Anyway, is there already any news on TOEBI 2.0 which you could leak at this stage?

    I am excited about the new update and guess the “missing puzzle piece”
    will finally silence your critics.

    Keep up the good work
    and enjoy the summer,

    fritz

  17. Anyway, is there already any news on TOEBI 2.0 which you could leak at this stage?

    Nope. I’m at the moment collecting needed information.

    I’m enjoying the summer as much as possible. To be honest, real summer here in Finland just started during this week. Before this week the weather has been exceptionally poor, rainy and cold most of the time.

  18. Also from my side:

    Congratulations to your excellent work, Mr. Rouvari!

    Can’t wait for the 2.0 release… so exciting 🙂

  19. Excellent work!

    Can’t wait for the 2.0 release…

    ps: How is the weather in Sweden? Here summer was sooooo hot!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *