The Name of the Game - Antimatter Bomb, that's the only way prevent Armageddon in reality. According to the mainstream physics antimatter bomb isn't an option, it takes too long and too much energy produce enough antimatter for the prevention purpose. Also storing antimatter is overwhelmingly difficult, current record time is somewhere near 15 minutes. Conclusion, antimatter bomb based solution is impossible...
... or is it? Let's see what TOEBI offers. Based on TOEBI, antimatter bomb is in theory relatively easy to build, see my previous posts on the topic. Testing my idea is done pretty easily, you can do it either with electrons or with protons and needed details can be found from those previous blog posts. Do mainstream physicists really have the balls not to make the experiment? I mean, every lost week, month, year diminishes our chances in case of incoming devastating asteroid. Apparently they have the balls! Most likely explanation is their ignorance and arrogance, those who are not familiar with my theory are ignorant and those who are familiar with, are just arrogant.
What can I do? Not that much by myself, but you can help me... spread the word! We might have a fighting chance in case of potential Armageddon, even in case of late discovery. Let's make the mainstream physicists try out my idea! Costs are minimal but the potential gain is astronomical.
I just managed to watch the movie, Particle Fever. Even though all of its grounds are not in line with TOEBI, especially that Higgs boson and its meaning, I kind of liked the outcome. First of all, the underlying story was just great. Huge amounts of time and money were spend along those years from the idea to the "discovery", so many intelligent people were involved and so on... and even though I don't buy Higgs boson and related field as a mass producer entity, I got a bit of emotional during the announcement at CERN. What a great story and a great movie!
In my previous Higgs related post I kind of went on full blown ranting mode, but to my excuse, it happened when I was young and furious See, people do change, no ranting anymore... And in that previous post, I also predicted that with higher energies we might get new particles. Well, to be honest, new particles are detected already with existing energies, so that prediction wasn't that amazing.
Hopefully, some day, I manage get enough time to really ponder new Standard Model out, so far, TOEBI needs only FTEPs, electrons and photons, everything else is a pretty much some sort of combination of those three and/or particles spinning with different frequencies, but I won't go into details in this post.
Conclusion: Check out the movie and enjoy the excitement!
I'm usually pretty optimistic guy, everything goes eventually just fine... no, there won't be any rain at the golf course even though the sky is almost black, sure there's enough food for everyone, relax... etc. My friends and my wife keep on nagging about it, but that's just me, an optimistic guy. Naturally I'm not optimistic in every situation.
To me, TOEBI is currently a white swan, but for the rest of the world it's definitely a black swan (the concept from Taleb's book). Everything goes as smoothly as normally until the moment when this new ultimate black swan enters the scene... and we are gone for good. Other civilizations wonder yet another gamma ray burst (GRB) from an area lacking a potential GRB source. Yeah, keep on wondering... your time will come eventually.
There I said it, see, I'm not that optimistic guy anymore. But why I'm so pessimistic about our future? Well, the problem is with the ease of causing a GRB. I won't go into details but it won't need much of the equipment, it needs only proper understanding of the nature and voilà you have The Great Filter in front of your noses.
What can we do in order to prevent the doom? Not much... I wrote an essay (which participated FQXi essay contest 2014) about what to do, Plan, but that ain't gonna save us. Escaping the planet far enough takes too much time. In case of GRB we are not in a safe distance in many, many, many years with the current technology. Antimatter based technology might give us the needed tools for escaping far enough but at that point the doom is just about hit us... so no escape possible.
But optimistic guy like me see something optimistic even in our future pessimistic destiny... The End won't hurt and it's equal to all Also the knowledge of our potential destiny frees us to enjoy the moment fully.
Originally this post was published partly for about month ago but I didn't have proper time to finish it. Better luck this time...
Both of them comes for free and naturally with TOEBI (notice the new writing style for ToEbi). Locality is one thing that makes sense to most mainstream physicists. But in current QM, realism is abandoned. Let's see what we can do about it.
Based on TOEBI, particles are concrete, rotating, spherical objects, just like a rotating ball or something hence realism is given. There is all the time "well" known TOEBI defined spin vector attached to a particle. Picture below presents the correlation between TOEBI defined spin and spin concept used in mainstream physics.
As you can see, there is a little mismatch between TOEBI spin (vector) and QM spin, so it gives me always an extra headache when I'm converting these concepts back and forth for example when reading QM papers. Bottom line is that TOEBI spin vector presents realism, it just exists all the time with certain values (a direction, a spinning frequency), measured or not.
The question goes, does TOEBI realism agree with QM predictions? It sure does! Continue reading
I have at the moment difficulties to find the time and willpower to write about TOEBI and not to mention develop it further. There is multiple reasons...
- No extra time available. TOEBI isn't my full-time activity/job. I have few ideas for changing the situation but nothing will realise in the near future though. I'll let you know when there is news in this front.
- Motivation dip. Who the heck can keep on pushing forever by burning midnight oil? I can't My motivation is clearly dipped, but I hope by fixing the first pointer this motivation issue gets fixed too.
- The great filter! What if I'm right with my theory? In the worst case scenario we might end up being nothing but high energy photons, that's nice... not. I really don't know what to do with this issue. I need to ponder it hard and thoroughly.
Let's see what the future brings. For example, there should be Juno Earth flyby results online within couple of months. If my prediction 1.09 mm/s at perigee is correct that will qualify as a motivation boost for sure
Let's figure out how much our Sun bends starlight according to ToEbi. We have all the needed initial figures.
- Mass of Sun: kg
- Photon mass: kg (Planck constant which in reality is photon mass)
- (Stellar) rotation frequency of Sun: 1/s
- Sun's radius: m
By integrating over 500 seconds we get pretty much the half of the impulse deflecting starlight.
Hence the total impulse
J and deflection angle is then
rad, however, the measured angle is
rad. So, according to ToEbi, Sun's gravitational influence per se doesn't bend starlight as much as observed. There have to be another mechanism also behind the observed deflection.
Let's focus on atomic level interaction between matter and light. What we are looking for is a phenomenon where we observe the bending of light without dispersion like behaviour where the amount of bending depends also on light's wavelength. I will write a paper of its own regarding this matter or write a chapter into future Introduction to ToEbi.
Update: Picture below gives a hint about what's going on...
Changes in star positions during the eclipse of 1922.
Don't worry, I have more than 20 years until my retirement! Unless I choose to make an early retirement Right... the project. Just for fun I searched for cryocoolers and guess what? Used cryocoolers don't cost as much as one might expect. With thousand bucks or so one can get a pretty decent cryocooler capable of bringing hydrogen under 13.99 K. Oh yeah, that means solid hydrogen my dear reader
With solid hydrogen I can confirm pretty easily the unique prediction of ToEbi regarding particle annihilation. Funny thing is that playing around with solid hydrogen is cheaper than making my case with two decent electron guns, fancier outcome with lesser money.
Obviously, now I'm wondering should I build the setup now instead of waiting over 20 years... I might better think this through while resting in my garden swing
In this post I'll do some calculations involving our Sun, Earth and Moon. Let's start with Sun and Earth. How much mass Sun has? Based on Newton, the mass of Sun is kg. Based on ToEbi, the mass of Sun is
which gives us
kg. Total rotation frequency of Sun is an estimation  combining the rotation frequency of the core and outer layer.
Ok then, how about our Moon? Current estimation is kg. Based on ToEbi, the mass of Moon can be calculated from
kg! That's right, Moon has a bigger mass than Earth! But Moon orbits Earth, not the other way round! That's right, the big difference comes from Moon's much smaller rotation frequency
How about forces between Sun, Moon and Earth (based on ToEbi)?
- Sun - Earth: N
- Earth - Moon: N
- Sun - Moon: N
So, there is no chance that Sun takes Moon from us At least not in the near future.
Well well well... time flies indeed. In last year's "interview" I speculated that in optimistic scenario ToEbi might break through in next 12 months, but it didn't. Next 12 months don't look any better in that sense either Why? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidences, and ToEbi surely belongs to the category.
I could write dozens of papers and talk with hundreds of physicists with very little traction. I have suggested all kinds of experiments to various physicists and asked penetrating questions in differents venues, all in vain. But there is also physicists who listens at first but after awhile get covered with disbelief, fear and denial. With fear I mean the fear of the consequences if (and when) I'm right. Digging one's head under the sand is always wise and productive, not!
What can I do? It depends on what do I want. Do I know what I really want? I'm not so sure anymore Like an year ago, I was sure, quick breakthrough and so on. What would that mean? Nothing positive in a long run. ToEbi breakthrough means factually devising antimatter based explosion and that can't and won't be a positive thing on my CV So, do you see my dilemma?
Anyway, now I KNOW what the great filter is and the answer to Fermi paradox, that's something, isn't it? It's dead planet orbiting.
Finally, I got the time to calculate expected time dilation near spinning disk. Let's say that disk mass = 6.3 g, spinning rate = 16666.667 rps, disk radius = 2 cm and gap between disk's edge and clock (at least clock's quartz crystal) = 0.5 cm. All this happens 1 m above the ground and all units are excluded due to problems in classical physics
At first we should calculate generated acceleration caused by spinning disk. We should use Second and Third laws of ToEbi. Dampening factor () generated by rotating Earth is
and generated acceleration including dampening
Acceleration generated by gravitational interaction is , so we can see immediately that generated time dilation won't be that big. Anyway, the next step is to calculate actual time dilation with equations described in Atom Model and Relativity paper. At this point, I must remind that measuring the acceleration on the clock won't be too hard!
Gravitational factor of relativity is defined in ToEbi as
which applies when we study gravitational factor of relativity near a stellar object. We can handle our "gravitational" factor of relativity purely based on generated acceleration on our clock, Earth generates
and spinning disk
Clock stands still hence relativity factor equals gravitational factor of relativity and so change factor
After 24 hours the clock has fallen behind seconds. That's just too damn small amount of time to detect. Luckily, generated force on the clock is easier to detect. Let's say that the clock's mass is 50 grams (and the clock is imaginary tiny one), generated force is