# Juno flyby anomaly

UPDATE: Finally (on 10th Dec.) we might get those results from Juno's Earth flyby  http://phys.org/wire-news/147545245/agu-fall-meeting-press-conference-schedule-briefings-streamed-on.html

There is an unique opportunity for ToEbi coming on October 9! The spacecraft of Juno mission makes Earth flyby at that date. One thing that is closely looked at is the so called flyby anomaly. Contemporary physics can't explain the phenomenon but ToEbi can! I'm going to give an exact prediction on how big the acceleration change for the spacecraft will be. Of course, I don't know all the mission details so I have a three scenarios.

Quote from SPACEFLIGHT101:

During its mission, Juno spins at different rates depending on mission maneuvers. During Cruise, Juno makes one rotation per minute, during science operations, the spin rate is 2rpm and for Main Engine Burns, the spin rate is increased to 5rpm.

Ok, what will be the spin frequency during the flyby? Probably that 2 rpm. After all, they are going to do some science operations near Earth, right? And why would they use the Main engine (even though it would give the biggest boost )? Anyway, here are the predictions for all those three different spin frequencies (Disclaimer: The spin plane of Juno must point towards Earth's core during the closest part of the flyby). Based on previous flybys, my prediction is at perigee. Anomalous speed increase is in case of

1. 1 rpm: 0.278 mm/s
2. 2 rpm: 1.111 mm/s
3. 5 prm: 6.944 mm/s

Calculations are based purely on spin frequency of the spacecraft. Newton's gravitational equation rules Juno's behaviour during the closest part of flyby

but based on ToEbi it should be

in other words

where

Gravitational slingshot is a perfect elastic collision so the difference between expected zero (actually it might be $6.67*10^{-8}$ mm/s) and measured speed increase must depend on spin frequencies of the spacecraft and Earth (which are not considered as relevant variables in case of elastic collisions), there is no other variables explaining the phenomenon so well. In normal conditions during a flyby, spacecrafts using reaction wheel mechanism (no spinning used) won't gain any anomalous speed increase (except that possible  $6.67*10^{-8}$ mm/s).

Interesting to see the actual outcome! Have fun! Here is the first press release and the (updated) second press release.

Update:  Measurements considering flyby anomaly start seven days earlier and end seven days after the flyby. Therefore we are going to get the results not earlier than Oct. 17.

Update: Interesting to see how the triggered safe mode effected the flyby anomaly. If I understood correctly Juno's attitude changed towards Sun due to safe mode. That kind of maneuver breaks the symmetry of flyby, especially during the closest part of flyby. However, the first half of the flyby went normally.

Update: Total anomalous speed increase would be something like 2.2 mm/s if 2 rpm spin frequency was kept during the whole flyby. However, Juno went into safe mode after 10 minutes from the closest approach. During safe mode, Juno takes an attitude towards Sun. Was spin frequency changed to 1 rpm? What was the new spin plane angle towards Earth? I can't give decent prediction for the total anomalous speed increase due to lack of information.

# Tiede.fi (In Finnish)

Suomenkielisen Tiede-aikakauslehden kylkeen liimattu keskustelufoorumi uudistui, monellakin tavalla. Niin kuin aina, muutosvastarinta nosti rumaa päätään. Valitusta tulee niin aiheesta kuin aiheettomasti. Monet keskustelijat ovat jättäneet tai ovat jättämässä foorumin taakseen. Mutta ei kai sentään yksistään uudistusten vuoksi? Palautetta voi antaa ylläpidolle ja sitä varmasti kuunnellaan. Visuaalinen uudistaminen ja teknisen luotettavuuden parantaminen eivät kuitenkaan yksistään riitä pitämään keskustelijoita tyytyväisinä.

Keskustelufoorumin moderointi on ollut jo vuosia retuperällä. Jonkinlaista parannusta yritettiin vajaa vuosi sitten, jolloin moderointi jaettiin yhdeltä mieheltä isommalle porukalle (Phony + toimituksen väkeä?). Samaan aikaan allekirjoittanut sai porttikiellon kyseiselle foorumille. Phony-nimimerkin "hyvän" moderoinnin tuloksena sain jo ennen porttikieltoa osakseni erityiskohtelua, jonkun mielestä jopa nettikiusaamista. Oli miten oli, nyt tunnukseni (illuusio) näyttää taas toimivan, lieneekö kyseessä konversion aikaisesta virheestä tai porttikiellon pituudesta (jota ei luonnollisestikaan kerrottu minulle missään vaiheessa). Odotan mielenkiinnolla tuleeko uudistusta myös foorumin moderointiin. Edelleen keskustelijat voivat käyttäytyä epäasiallisesti, toki joskus täysin ymmärrettävistä syistä Moderaattorin tehtävä on kuitenkin pitää keskustelu sivistyneellä tasolla, keinoja siihen kyllä löytyy.

Toivotaan parasta ja pelätään pahinta!

# Experiment for Reduced Gravitational Interaction

When you have it (in this case the right theory) you are bound to success And yes, I know that my style of explaining things is annoying and sometimes arrogant. But as Britney Spears said it, that's my prerogative Back to the point... I was just giving answer in ResearchGate when I realized how to detects "gravitons". Gravitons... well, that's just too narrow name for those particles responsible for gravitational interaction, after all, they are FTEPs (Force Transfer Ether Particles) which deliver all the interactions.

So, how to detect those particles? What would be the experiment revealing those particles like? As usually, the answer is very simple. Just kick out from the volume as many of those FTEPs as you can and measure the effect on object's weight inside the volume. Sounds trivial and easy to accomplish, and it really is! The idea is to rotate for example metal discs in a setup where those discs form a volume where we can measure the object's weight. Those rotating discs and their atoms hit an extra amount of Earth's FTEPs and eject those extra FTEPs away from the volume. Higher the spin frequency and thicker the discs then bigger is the impact on object's weight. Described experiment is easily derived from ToEbi's gravitational interaction chapter. Maybe two (or even more) spinning hollow spheres (one inside the other) with perpendicular spin axes would be more elegant setup. Even one spinning sphere might give a small effect.

There has been similar experiments earlier, like the experiment of Podkletnov. Kind of funny that mr. Podkletnov worked here in Finland during the episode.

Update: It might be better to write a decent paper and submit it to viXra.org. Same applies with my new idea how to detect which slit electron went in double slit experiment without breaking the interference pattern.

# Lorentz Factor is Bull's Shit

Really? You may say. Let me explain that claim a bit. It's not bull's shit per se but using it in the case of time dilation it is. Lorentz factor is based on constant speed of light which by the way holds only in a vacuum. It surely is constant in some idealized physics daydream thought experiment but not inside an atom where the time is actually happening (atomic clocks). There you can kiss goodbye to your constant speed of light. Or do you disagree? If you do disagree, I would really love to hear your arguments

In case you want more realistic explanation for time dilation you should read Atom Model and Relativity. It describes more realistic roots for time dilation and gives proper equations for calculating it. Once again, after writing this post, I feel nauseous from the fact how fucked up the contemporary physics is.

# Graphene Oxide

Well well well... Here's what I have been looking for http://www.gizmag.com/graphene-superpermeable-to-water/21240/ (reduced) Graphene Oxide! YES! The absolute best part is that you can purchase it from eBay.com. Christmas came early this year

Monolayer of water molecules, that's what's needed in order to constrain water molecule's freedom to move. Constraining the movement is essential step in order to induce proton annihilation. Here's a picture describing the target setup in case of para-water molecule. And don't mind the shape of those GO sheets

By putting a magnet under the bottom GO sheet we can achieve needed spin axis alignment of protons and minimize the precession of them. However, the other proton, due to different spin direction, is pushed away from magnet. That's why GO sheets are so important, they prevent pushed away proton's movement. Additional help is got from other incoming water molecules which prevent even further the movement of those protons Very clever setup indeed. The gap between those GO sheets is something like 0.6-0.7 nm, which is just enough to host a monolayer of water molecules.

I haven't tried that setup yet so if you try it, please report your observations to this post. You should have a radiation meter and a cloud chamber would be a nice bonus. Also, you might have to shake horizontally your setup a bit in order to further increase annihilation probabilities. In that case, the used magnet should be attached to your apparatus. I have planned to put those wet GO sheets between two glass pieces and tape them together. Then it's easy to tape a magnet to the bottom

# Physical Constants

Let's take a closer look at current physical constants. I'll write this post in pieces and tweet whenever there is something new in it. If you haven't read ToEbi yet this might the moment. It certainly helps you to understand what I'm about to present.

Planck constant $h$

Obviously, it's the mass of photon. Contemporary physics regards it as a proportionality constant. First Law of ToEbi states $E=mn$ where $m$ is mass and $n$ is spin frequency of particle, hence that $m_{photon}=h$ is obvious.

Gravitational constant $G$

Again, contemporary physics regards it as a proportionality constant and on top of that, regards it as universal! Another nice example of Earth centric thinking Realized from Second Law of ToEbi, $G=N (\frac{ms}{kg})^2\frac{1}{2}n^2$ and therefore it's not universal. Every stellar object has its own $G$ .

Speed of light (in vacuum) $c$

This one is a real treat. How come photons with different frequencies (hence energies) have the same speed? Naturally the density of surrounding FTE effects photons. For example, when photons approach Earth they experience blue shifting. Their masses ( $h$ ) and speed ( $c$ ) stay the same but frequencies increase due to denser FTE (more encounters with FTEPs). Red shifting is the reverse phenomenon. However, conditions in an atom are very much different. Due to high spin frequency of subatomic particles the FTE density in an atom (next to nucleus) at rest is $\approx 10^{43}$ times bigger than in a vacuum on Earth. What happens to a photon in these kinds of FTE densities?

Same blue and red shifting phenomena occur when photon approaches and exits an atom. However, those phenomena are very short lived and minor in the case of photon vs. atom. Obviously, as observed,  photon's speed decreases due to the massive increase of FTEP encounters (photon spins through FTE). Based on ToEbi energy relation $\Delta n = \frac{1}{2}\Delta v^2$ photon's spin frequency decreases, therefore photon's mass increases (Energy conservation). Increased photon's mass is crucial in order to understand why photons interact so well with electrons during their creation process and later. During the photon's exit phase reverse phenomenon applies.

Right... why the same speed? Created photons get their properties in an atom, including their speed. FTE density and its changes outside of atoms (=in vacuum) are negligible. Electron approaching nucleus compresses FTEPs together. After electron is stopped (or compressed photon gets the cross section of electron) newly created photon experiences huge repulsive force. Gained energy is stored into photon's spin frequency, including decreased mass (for example $m_{electron} \rightarrow h$ ).

But again, why the same speed? Well, the reason is extremely trivial, it's the size of photon's cross section (mass). It just prevents photons go any faster!

Electromagnetic constants

Well, how should I put this nicely...? Whole EM field is severely fucked up. What else one can expect when the concept of charge itself is superfluous. Therefore I don't see any compelling reason to explain electromagnetic constants from ToEbi point of view. There is no need for those constants at the first place. Only thing from ToEbi which is somewhat relevant to contemporary electromagnetic constants is Third Law of ToEbi which gives needed dampening factor (proportionality "constant") to force calculations.

To be continue...

# 1.1 Billion Dollar Experiment

Ongoing Juno mission costs roughly 1.1 billion and it nicely qualifies as an experiment for ToEbi. Juno spacecraft has attitude towards Earth after its Earth flyby (10/9/2013). Due to chosen attitude combined with the spacecraft's stabilization method (spinning) Juno spacecraft is experiencing an additional (anomalous) acceleration towards Sun. Magnitude of the acceleration depends on angle of Earth-spacecraft-Sun, here is more details.

Interesting to see when NASA does something in order to save their mission. If they want to save the mission they must change Juno's attitude towards Sun! Otherwise Juno won't make it. Either way, ToEbi gets another proof.

# Two Pieces of Glass and One Magnet

Following description is totally speculative and it most likely won't work just like that without further tweaks. But in case it works you should have at least a radiation meter. Cloud chamber would be swell

While introducing those hydrogen atoms in para-water molecule you need to constrain their movement. One potential technique might be a drop of water between two clean and smooth surfaced pieces of glass. Manipulate those glass pieces so that water is spread out on as large area as possible. You might use duct tape in order to keep those pieces as close as possible to each other. Due to adhesion, water molecules form a very thin film between those pieces. On top of that, adhesion overcomes cohesive forces so those water molecules are very closely packed. Keep the system on horizontal position and place a neodymium magnet under it (again, use duct tape). By keeping the magnet under those glass pieces you'll reduce the unwanted precession.

Due to magnet and constraining environment those hydrogen atoms in para-water molecules might gain the spin orientation which allows them to annihilate. If nothing happens shake a little bit those glass pieces and magnet horizontally. Again, there is a pretty good chance that nothing happens. However, constraining atom movement and usage of magnet(s) is the basis for the antimatter utilization techniques. Have Fun!

Update: I found better material than glass! I'll make new post on it later.

# A Little Confession

Forget those cobalt bullions, you don't need them. Ordinary tap water works just fine! 25% of that water (in room temperature) is so called para-water where those two hydrogen atoms have different spin directions. Their proximity is very convenient. You only need to know the method for introducing them

My personal target (to make ToEbi break) deadline expires on 12/31/2013. Evidently, there is lots of interest towards ToEbi but the final step is missing therefore I'm going to use my final option. Meanwhile, have fun!

# Physicists, need for money?

Physicists, do you need a lots of money? Do you want to make science history? I can offer both. You only have to read few scientific papers of mine and open your eyes. In case you understand completely what I'm writing in those papers you'll realize the potential for early adopters. I'm not joking around. You can run experiments and verify that ToEbi is the theory. Modified Cavendish experiment is relatively easy to setup, you can run simulations with ToEbi laws, wait the results of Juno's Earth flyby, play around with cobalt and magnetic fields etc.

At the moment when shit hits the fan you'll have the pole position. Companies and agencies will pay anything in order to get their piece of the action. Antimatter utilization techniques will be the next physics milestone. Interested? Read my papers and give yourself a chance! You can also make me a collaboration proposition. At the moment, I'm a free man.

# Collaboration

I have thought hard about possible ways for the collaboration. My goal is to develop extremely effective antimatter utilization techniques. I have a working, testable/tested, theory to lean on, but on my own the progress is too damn slow for my taste. Should I go with the public collaboration? Initially, that was my number one option, but... why would I give away gained know-how for free? After all, I have worked my face off for a pretty long time now This ain't my daytime job you know.

Another option is to find a collaborator who shares my interests and who's willing to pay me for pursuing the goal. Collaborator can't be just anybody or any organisation. It should provide

• secure facilities
• funding
• fair deal with me
• team of particle physicists

First decent offer qualifies.

Update: I speed up things a bit... Have Fun!